Kerala High Court

Bail Appl./10846/2011 of SUNIL Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2011

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 10846 of 2011() (CRIME NO. 1135/2011 OF VADAKKENCHERRY POLICE STATION (PALAKKAD DISTRICT) PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED: -------------------------------

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN

FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933

Bail Appl..No. 10846 of 2011()

(CRIME NO. 1135/2011 OF VADAKKENCHERRY POLICE STATION (PALAKKAD DISTRICT)

PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED:

-------------------------------

SUNIL,S/O.DHARMABUSHAN PANIKAR,

AGED 40 YEARS,3-13 CHOICE GARDEN,TOC-H ROAD, VYTTILA,ERNAKULAM.

BY ADV. SRI.T.K.RAJESHKUMAR

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS:

----------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA,AREPRESENTED BY

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. C.I. OF POLICE,VADAKKENCHERRY POLICE

STATION,PALAGHAT DISTRICT.

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RASHEED.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 30/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE

FOLLOWING:

= = = = = = = = = = = = =

DATED THIS, THE 30[th] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011.

O R D E R

Page 1 of 2

Petitioner is the fourth accused in Crime No. 1135 of 2011 ofVadakkancherry Police Station (O.R. 26/2011 of Alathur Forest Range)alleging offence under Section 49B read with Section 51 of the Wild Life(Protection) Act, 1972.

2. Having heard either side, it is revealed that the case was registeredin relation to the seizure of horns of a deer and that the recovery of thearticle is over and that the petitioner is in custody eversince 15.12.2011. Insuch circumstances, I direct the learned magistrate to release the petitioneron bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand)with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to his satisfaction on thefollowing conditions:

(i) . The petitioner shall report before the investigating officer as and when called upon. as and when called upon.

(ii) He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) Petitioner shall not involve in any offence while on bail.

knc/-

P.S. GOPINATHAN,(JUDGE)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead