Kerala High Court
WP(C)/38746/2010 of LAW STUDENTS ORGANISATION Vs UNIVERSITY OF KERALA on 31 December 2010
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 38746 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LAW STUDENTS ORGANISATION, (REG.NO.T 533/10), REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
FRIDAY, THE 31ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH POUSHA 1932
WP(C).No. 38746 of 2010(P)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
---------------
LAW STUDENTS ORGANISATION, (REG.NO.T
533/10), REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, PADMAJA DEVI S.P., CHANJAM VEEDU AVENUE,MALLOOR
ROAD, VANCHIYOOR, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.I.SHAHUL HAMEED
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
1. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED
BY REGISTRAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,
UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC. UNIVERSITY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 31/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
K.SURENDRAMOHAN, J.
---------------------------------------
WP (C) No. 38746 of 2010
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is a registered association of law students. The petitioner has filed this writ petitionchallenging the examination schedule published by theUniversity of Kerala. The complaint of the petitioner isthat as per the examination schedule the LLBexaminations are scheduled to be conducted on dailybasis without giving any break in between. According to the petitioner, a break is given only after twoexaminations which are scheduled on consecutive days.The present schedule puts the students to a lot ofinconvenience and trouble. Therefore, the petitionerseeks the issue of a writ of mandamus or some otherappropriate writ, order or direction to change theexamination schedule in such a manner as to have eachexamination conducted on alternate days.
2. I notice that the petitioner organisation is not seeking to enforce any legal right of theirs. The WP (C) No. 38746 of 2010
2
petitioner's organization does not have any right to claimthat the examinations should be scheduled and conductedon alternate days. It is for the University, the expertbody, to schedule and conduct the examinations in amanner that is deemed fit and proper by it. In suchacademic matters it is not at all desirable for this Courtto interfere and give directions so as to upset the entireexamination schedule. I find no merit in this writ petition.Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
K.SURENDRAMOHAN,
JUDGE.
rkc