Kerala High Court
WP(C)/42877/2022 of K.J.MATHEW Vs REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY on 30 December 2022
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 42877 OF 2022 PETITIONERS: 1 K.J.MATHEW S/O. JOHN, AKASALAYIL HOUSE, KUMARANALLUR P.O., KOTTAYAM-686016. 2 K.C.JOSE, KEERIPPEL HOUSE, VELIYANNUR P.O.,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 30[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944WP(C) NO. 42877 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:
1K.J.MATHEWS/O. JOHN, AKASALAYIL HOUSE, KUMARANALLUR P.O., KOTTAYAM-686016.2K.C.JOSE, KEERIPPEL HOUSE, VELIYANNUR P.O., KOTTAYAM-686634.BY ADV I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITYCIVIL STATION P.O., IDUKKI-685603.2THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION P.O., IDUKKI-685603.BY ADV SMT.ANIMA - GP
IDUKKI, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE,
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 30.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2022
The 1[st] petitioner is the holder of Ext.P1 regular permit.According to him, since he is not keeping good health, he wants totransfer Ext.P1 permit in the name of the 2[nd] petitioner.Accordingly, Ext.P2 joint application for transfer of permit wassubmitted before the 1[st] respondent. The grievance of thepetitioners is that the joint application for transfer of permit is notso far considered by the 1[st] respondent.
2. Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the GovernmentPleader for the respondents.
3. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to dispose of Ext.P2 joint application. Hence, this writ petition isdisposed of in the following manner:
1. There shall be a direction to the 1[st] respondent to consider Ext.P2 joint application for transfer ofExt.P1 permit as expeditiously as possible, at anyrate, within a period of two months from the date of anm : 3 :
receipt of a copy of this judgment.
2. In case the meeting of the RTA is not convenedduring the above period, the respondents shall takenecessary steps adopting the method of circulation.3. I make it clear that I have not considered thematter on merit and the authority can passappropriate order, in accordance to law.
Sd/-N. NAGARESH JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 42877/2022
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITSExhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ON THE ROUTE BAISONVALLY-KOTTAYAM DATED 3.12.2022.Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE JOINT APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS ON 20.10.2022.Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.31844/2022 DATED 7.10.2022.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL