Kerala High Court
WP(C)/41358/2016 of SHANMUGAN Vs THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE on 30 December 2016
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/9TH POUSHA, 1938 WP(C). NO.41358 OF 2016 (T) ------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- SHANMUGAN, S/O.LATE KESAVAN, AGED 38 YEARS, KIZHAKKEMURI, KIZHAKKEMURI P.O.,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/9TH POUSHA, 1938
WP(C). NO.41358 OF 2016 (T) ------------- PETITIONER(S):------------- SHANMUGAN, S/O.LATE KESAVAN, AGED 38 YEARS,KIZHAKKEMURI, KIZHAKKEMURI P.O.,ELAVANCHERY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.U.MADHU
RESPONDENT(S):--------------
1. THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, ELAVANCHERRY PANCHAYATH, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, ELAVANCHERRY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678001. ELAVANCHERRY PANCHAYATH, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, ELAVANCHERRY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678001.
2. THE DISTRICT LEVEL AUTHORIZED COMMITTEE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (RDO), PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678001. PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (RDO), PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.VINEETHA HARIRAJ
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON30-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).41358/2016 (T)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
P1:COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 03.06.2016 ISSUED BY THEELAVANCHERRY VILLAGE OFFICE.ELAVANCHERRY VILLAGE OFFICE.
P2:COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE DRAFT DATA BANK OF THEELAVANCHERRY VILLAGE.ELAVANCHERRY VILLAGE.
P3:COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.11.2016 SUBMITTED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
Page 1 of 2
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL
KRJ
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No.41358 of 2016
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2016
JUDGMENT
The petitioner seeks that the entries relating to the classification of his property in the draft data bank be corrected inaccordance with law. However, according to him, this has not beenconsidered by the authorities concerned and he has, therefore, filedthis writ petition for necessary orders.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of therespondents.
3. I have been informed by the parties on either side that thedata bank now available is only a draft one. I do not, therefore, seeany reason why corrections cannot be made thereon, in accordancewith law, if proper applications are made by the petitioner. In suchcircumstances, I direct the first respondent to consider Exhibit P3application of the petitioner, after obtaining the recommendationsand clearances of all the authorities, including the Agricultural WP(C).41358/16
-:2:-
Officer, in accordance with law and in accordance with theapplicable Act and Regulations, within a period of two months fromthe date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
No further orders are required in this writ petition. The writpetition is, therefore, disposed of with the above direction.
krj.30/12
Sd/-Devan Ramachandran, Judge
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…