Uttarakhand High Court
BA2/1031/2003 of AMRISH Vs STATE on 18 December 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of December 2003 Second Bail Application No. 1031 of 2003 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Amrish S/o Sri Omkar R/o village Kinoni P.S. Sahpur District Muzaffarnagr
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Dated: Nainital: the 18[th] day of December 2003
Second Bail Application No. 1031 of 2003 Order on the Bail application of accused.
CRIMINAL SIDE
Amrish S/o Sri Omkar R/o village Kinoni P.S. Sahpur District Muzaffarnagr ………. Applicant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal … Opposite Party
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of Case crime No. 309 of 2002 Under Section 302/394/411 I.P.C. P.S. Manglaur District Haridwar By the Court Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
This is second bail application of the applicant. The applicant has submitted that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined. Neither his name in the F.I.R. nor in any statement of any witnesses of the prosecution has been mentioned. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Amrish be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Haridwar.
(M.M. Ghildiyal, J.)