Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./9051/2014 of JACOB VARGHESE Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2014
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/9TH POUSHA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 9051 of 2014 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 2467/2014 OF KOTHAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ----------------
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/9TH POUSHA, 1936
Bail Appl..No. 9051 of 2014 ()
-------------------------------
CRIME NO. 2467/2014 OF KOTHAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT
----------------
PETITIONER/ACCUSED :
---------------------------------
JACOB VARGHESE, AGED 51 YEARS, ANNIKUZHIYIL HOUSE, PINDIMANA, VADATTUPARA, AMBALAPADY, BOOTHATHAN KETTU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN-686691.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RUSSEL
RESPONDENTS :
-----------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. THE S.I. OF POLICE KOTHAMANGALAM POLICE, STATION, ERNAKULAM RURAL, PIN-686691.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. RJESH VIJAYAN
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-12-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
B. KEMAL PASHA, J.
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
B.A. No.9051 of 2014
Page 1 of 2
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2014
O R D E R
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.2467/2014
of Kothamangalam Police Station registered for the offencespunishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 326 IPC.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that, on23.10.2014 at 10.15 a.m., he abused the de factocomplainant, who is his own brother, and attacked him witha chopper. It is alleged that he indiscriminately inflicted cutinjuries on the de facto complainant with the chopper,thereby causing an injury on his head and also a fracture toone of his fingers.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner andlearned Public Prosecutor.
5. The contents of the CD, prima facie, reveal the BA.9051/2014
complicity of the petitioner. The allegations against thepetitioner are very grave and serious. The investigation ofthis case is not over. Considering the seriousness of theallegations against the petitioner and the present stage ofthe investigation, I am of the view that the petitioner is notentitled to the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail.
In the result, this Bail Application is dismissed.
Sd/-
(B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE)
aks/30/12
// True Copy //
PA to Judge
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…