Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/1612/2004 of SUBHASH CHAND Vs UNION OF INDIA and ORS. on 24 December 2004
Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for Union of India. Both the parties are agreed that the writ petition may be decided finally at this stage. By means of order dated 9th December 2004, the petitioner was
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for Union of India.
Both the parties are agreed that the writ petition may be decided finally at this stage.
By means of order dated 9[th] December 2004, the petitioner was punished by reducing his salary to [3]/4. It was stated in the order that the petitioner shall not be entitled for any increment for the last 4 years.
Against the impugned order, the petitioner has filed appeal before respondent no. 1 on 17.12.2004.
The respondent no. 1 is directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Till the appeal is decided, recovery shall not be made from the petitioner.
With these directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of.
24.12.2004: (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.)NCM: