Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./9452/2019 of AMAL Vs STATE OF KERALA on 31 December 2019
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941 Bail Appl.No.9179 OF 2019 CRIME NO.1163/2019 OF VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 1: PRANAV AGED 21 YEARS S/O. PRASANNAN, PRASADAM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941
Bail Appl.No.9179 OF 2019
CRIME NO.1163/2019 OF VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 1:
PRANAVAGED 21 YEARSS/O. PRASANNAN, PRASADAM HOUSE, VALLIKUNNAM MURI, VALLIKUNNAM VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH
RESPONDENTS:
1STATE OF KERALAREPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031.2THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, 690 501.
BY SMT.SREEJA.V., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.12.2019, ALONG WITH BAIL APPL.No.9452/2019, THE COURT ON THESAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941
Bail Appl..No.9452 OF 2019
CRIME NO.1163/2019 OF VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:
AMALAGED 20 YEARSS/O.PRASANNA, PRABHATHAM, VALLIKUNNAM, ALAPPUZHA
BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMARSMT.A.SALINI LAL
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALAREP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
BY SMT.SREEJA.V., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.12.2019, ALONG WITH BAIL APPL.No.9179/2019, THE COURT ON THESAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
COMMON ORDER
[ Bail Appl.No.9179/2019 & Bail Appl.No.9452/2019 ]
Dated this the 31st day of December 2019
The petitioner in B.A.No. 9179/2019 is the first accused and the petitioner in B.A. No. 9452/2019 is thesecond accused in Crime No. 1163/2019 of VallikunnamPolice Station for having allegedly committed offencespunishable under Sections 323, 341, 427, 354, 506,294(b) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The allegation of the prosecution is that on03.12.2019, at about 6.30 P.M., the petitioners hadapproached the defacto complainant, who is a lady andintimidated her with abusive words and her uncle hadcome, he too abused and thereafter the girl and unclewere both assaulted. Petitioners had allegedly pulledher dress thereby outraged her modesty.
3. Records perused and the statement of defactocomplainant also perused.
4. It is pointed out that petitioners do not have any criminal antecedents. There is an indication thatthe first accused had an intimate relationship with thedefacto complainant and actually approached her andher uncle, to seek her hand in marriage. The scenehowever turned violent and resulted in the offenceallegedly committed by petitioners.
5.
Page 1 of 2
There is nothing to be recovered and
custodial interrogation of petitioners is not seem to beessential. No serious injuries have been inflicted. It istrue that petitioners were allegedly carrying a swordstick, but no injuries were inflicted with that swordstick, which was used only to intimidate the defactocomplainant.
6. allowed on the following conditions:-
Under such circumstances, petitions are
1) In the event of petitioners beingarrested, they shall be released on bail,on execution of bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each withtwo solvent sureties each for the likeamount to the satisfaction of thearrested, they shall be released on bail,on execution of bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each withtwo solvent sureties each for the likeamount to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.
2) Petitioners shall appear before theInvestigating Officer on every alternativemondays between 09.00 A.M. and 12.00P.M., for a period of three months or tillthe filing of final report, whichever isearlier.
Petitioners shall not get involved in similaroffences.
In case of breach of any of the conditions,the prosecution is at liberty to move forcancellation of bail before the jurisdictionalMagistrate.
SD/-
ASHOK MENON
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…