Kerala High Court

Bail Appl./9452/2019 of AMAL Vs STATE OF KERALA on 31 December 2019

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941 Bail Appl.No.9179 OF 2019 CRIME NO.1163/2019 OF VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 1: PRANAV AGED 21 YEARS S/O. PRASANNAN, PRASADAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON

TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941

Bail Appl.No.9179 OF 2019

CRIME NO.1163/2019 OF VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 1:

PRANAVAGED 21 YEARSS/O. PRASANNAN, PRASADAM HOUSE, VALLIKUNNAM MURI, VALLIKUNNAM VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK.

BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH

RESPONDENTS:

1STATE OF KERALAREPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031.2THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, 690 501.

BY SMT.SREEJA.V., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.12.2019, ALONG WITH BAIL APPL.No.9452/2019, THE COURT ON THESAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON

TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941

Bail Appl..No.9452 OF 2019

CRIME NO.1163/2019 OF VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:

AMALAGED 20 YEARSS/O.PRASANNA, PRABHATHAM, VALLIKUNNAM, ALAPPUZHA

BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMARSMT.A.SALINI LAL

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

STATE OF KERALAREP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM

BY SMT.SREEJA.V., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.12.2019, ALONG WITH BAIL APPL.No.9179/2019, THE COURT ON THESAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

COMMON ORDER

[ Bail Appl.No.9179/2019 & Bail Appl.No.9452/2019 ]

Dated this the 31st day of December 2019

The petitioner in B.A.No. 9179/2019 is the first accused and the petitioner in B.A. No. 9452/2019 is thesecond accused in Crime No. 1163/2019 of VallikunnamPolice Station for having allegedly committed offencespunishable under Sections 323, 341, 427, 354, 506,294(b) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The allegation of the prosecution is that on03.12.2019, at about 6.30 P.M., the petitioners hadapproached the defacto complainant, who is a lady andintimidated her with abusive words and her uncle hadcome, he too abused and thereafter the girl and unclewere both assaulted. Petitioners had allegedly pulledher dress thereby outraged her modesty.

3. Records perused and the statement of defactocomplainant also perused.

4. It is pointed out that petitioners do not have any criminal antecedents. There is an indication thatthe first accused had an intimate relationship with thedefacto complainant and actually approached her andher uncle, to seek her hand in marriage. The scenehowever turned violent and resulted in the offenceallegedly committed by petitioners.

5.

Page 1 of 2

There is nothing to be recovered and

custodial interrogation of petitioners is not seem to beessential. No serious injuries have been inflicted. It istrue that petitioners were allegedly carrying a swordstick, but no injuries were inflicted with that swordstick, which was used only to intimidate the defactocomplainant.

6. allowed on the following conditions:-

Under such circumstances, petitions are

1) In the event of petitioners beingarrested, they shall be released on bail,on execution of bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each withtwo solvent sureties each for the likeamount to the satisfaction of thearrested, they shall be released on bail,on execution of bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each withtwo solvent sureties each for the likeamount to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.

2) Petitioners shall appear before theInvestigating Officer on every alternativemondays between 09.00 A.M. and 12.00P.M., for a period of three months or tillthe filing of final report, whichever isearlier.

Petitioners shall not get involved in similaroffences.

In case of breach of any of the conditions,the prosecution is at liberty to move forcancellation of bail before the jurisdictionalMagistrate.

SD/-

ASHOK MENON

JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead