Kerala High Court

WP(C)/31134/2012 of M.VIJAYALAKSHMY Vs DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR on 31 December 2012

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 WP(C).No. 31134 of 2012 (N) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------- M.VIJAYALAKSHMY, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O. T.RAGHUNANDANAN, "VIPANCHIKA",

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC

MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934

WP(C).No. 31134 of 2012 (N) --------------------------- PETITIONER:----------- M.VIJAYALAKSHMY, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O. T.RAGHUNANDANAN, "VIPANCHIKA", NATTIKA DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 567.

BY ADV. SRI.M.PREMCHAND

RESPONDENT(S):

--------------1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR, COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680 003.2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR, COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, PIN-680 003.3. ASSESSING AUTHORITY & TAHSILDAR, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR-680 506. BY SRI.S.SUDHEESH KUMAR, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

AS

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:

P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 06.06.1998 ISSUED BY NATTIKA GRAMA PANCHAYATH.PANCHAYATH.

P2:TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 17.02.2009 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.RESPONDENT.

P3: PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13.03.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE

P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.BT2-22569/08 DATED 30.03.2009 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

P5: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 21.04.2009 OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, NATTIKA.NATTIKA.

P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.11.2009 OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT.

Page 1 of 2

P7: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.BT2-22569/2008 DATED 29.08.2010 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

P8: TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE ORDER BEARING NO.C1-15816/10 DATED 29.12.2010 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.29.12.2010 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL

/TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE

AS

ANTONY DOMINIC, J.====================W.P.C. No. 31134 OF 2012====================Dated this the 31[st] day of December 2012

JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges the levy of building tax on aresidential building constructed by him.

2. However, it is seen that the final orders that werepassed against the petitioner are Exts. P7 and P8 and that theseorders are dated 29-8-2010 and 29-12-2010.

3. Evidently, therefore, the writ petition is now filedwith inordinate delay and for that reason, I am not inclined toentertain the writ petition.

Writ petition is dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC

JUDGE

kvr/

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead