Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./7584/2006 of C.RAJENDRAN Vs SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 26 December 2006
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2006 / 5TH POUSHA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 7584 of 2006() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.526/06 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION. PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3: ------------------------------- C.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2006 / 5TH POUSHA 1928
Bail Appl..No. 7584 of 2006()
-----------------------------
CRIME NO.526/06 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION.
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3:
-------------------------------
C. RAJENDRAN (SHOWN AS RAJAN IN THE FIR)
S/O. NARAYANAN, AGED 54 YEARS, J.M.NIVAS, P.O. KEECHERY, MATTANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS
RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT/STATE:
-------------------------------
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
HOSDURG POLICE STATION.
2. STATE REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI K.S.SIVAKUMAR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 26/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
V.RAMKUMAR, J.
-------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Petitioner who is the 3[rd] accused in Crime No.526/06 ofHosdurg Police Station for an offence punishable under section 379read with section 34 IPC in respect of a lorry, seeks anticipatory bail.The offence was committed on 30.11.2006.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the applicationsubmitting, inter alia, that accused 1 and 2 who were the co-accusedin the offence were arrested on 9.12.2006 and 15.12.2006respectively and the petitioner is also having the same degree ofcomplicity. There is no reason why the petitioner should notsurrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail.Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrateconcerned and files an application for regular bail, within two weeksfrom today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferablyon the same date on which it is filed.
With this direction, this petition is disposed of.
dsn
V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE