Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./7714/2009 of PRABHAVATHY Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 7714 of 2009() ----------------------------- CMP.8198/2009 of J.M.F.C.-I,NEYYATINKARA IN CRIME NO.45/2009 OF EXCISE RANGE, THIRUPURAM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 7714 of 2009()
----------------------------- CMP.8198/2009 of J.M.F.C.-I,NEYYATINKARA IN CRIME NO.45/2009OF EXCISE RANGE, THIRUPURAM
....................
PETITIONER/ACCUSED
-------------------
PRABHAVATHY, AGED 66, D/O.KAMALAMMA,
KATTU THARISSU PUTHEN VEEDU, ATHIYANNOOR DESOM, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANTS
---------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED VIA PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. EXCISE INSPECOR,
THIRUPURAM EXCISE RANGE.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SHRI C.K.SIVAKUMAR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
P. BHAVADASAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No. 7714 of 2009 - D
Page 1 of 2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 30th day of December, 2009.
ORDER
This is a petition filed under Section 439 of Criminal ProcedureCode seeking bail.
2. Petitioner is accused in Crime No. 45/2009 of Thirupuram Excise Range for the offences punishable under Sections 8(1)and (2) of the Abkari Act.
3. The facts are stated in the order of the court below, which is appended to this petition. Considering the quantity involved and also thefact that a good part of the investigation is over, bail can be granted.
The application is allowed as follows:
1) Petitioner shall be released on bail on her executing a bond for Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with two solvent suretieseach for the like sum to the satisfaction of JFCM concerned.
2) Petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with theevidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses.
P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…