Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2234/2008 of HARDAYAL SINGH and ANOTHER Vs SOMESHWAR MAHADEV MANDI, GANGA NAGAR, RISHIKESH on 30 December 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2234 of 2008 (M/S) Hardayal Singh & another. ………. Petitioners Versus Someshwar Mahadev Mandi. ………. Respondent Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the petitioners.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITALWrit Petition No. 2234 of 2008 (M/S)
Hardayal Singh & another.
………. Petitioners
Versus
Someshwar Mahadev Mandi.
………. Respondent
Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the petitioners.
Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J.
After hearing Mr. Alok Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rishikesh to take up, for hearing and final disposal, the Temporary Injunction Application, along with Applications filed by the petitioners herein (defendants in the Suit) under Order 39 Rule 4 and Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C., in Original Suit No. 56 of 2008 on 7[th] January, 2009, the date already fixed therein. If, for compelling reasons, the final disposal is not possible on 7[th] January, 2009, the Temporary Injunction Application, along with Applications filed by the petitioners herein (defendants in the Suit) under Order 39 Rule 4 and Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C., shall be taken up for disposal finally on day-to-day basis thereafter and shall be disposed of finally by passing a detailed, reasoned and speaking order.
Gs
(V.K. Gupta, C. J.)30.12.2008