Uttarakhand High Court
CLCON/263/2001 of KRISHNA SWQROOP SAXENA Vs BRAHMA SINGH NEGI and ORS. on 21 November 2002
of 2003 Hon.ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard Sri J.P. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.B. Tiwari, learned C.S.C. Against the order of the prescribed authority, an appeal was preferred as provided under the law and the learned District Judge concerned has passed an order summoning
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
WPMS No. 13 of 2003
Hon.ble Irshad Hussain, J.
Heard Sri J.P. Joshi, learnedcounsel for the petitioner and Sri N.B. Tiwari, learned C.S.C.
Against the order of theprescribed authority, an appeal was preferred as provided under the lawand the learned District Judgeconcerned has passed an order summoning the record on 28.11.2002and the matter of stay was deferredfor disposal. However, the record was not sent to the appellate Courtand the meanwhile on 11.12.2002,eviction order in form-B was issued. Considering this, the District Judge isdirected to decide the stay applicationby the date fixed and till then the eviction of the petitioner shall remainstayed.
With this the petition isdisposed of.
Dt. 08.1.2003
A
(Irshad Hussain, J.)