Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24158/2016 of R. SATHISHKUMAR Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24158 of 2016 R. SATHISHKUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALLAKULAM
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24158 of 2016
R. SATHISHKUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1
Vs
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALLAKULAM (CRIME) POLICE STATION,MADURAI.
IN CRIME NO. 1995 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.M.MOHAMED RAFI Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANDASAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A-1, in Crime No.1995 of2016, on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at thehands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishableunder Sections 379, 465, 468 and 471 I.P.C., and hence, seeksanticipatory bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent / State.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons hadstolen the cheques issued by the de facto complainant in favour ofher children and withdrawn huge money from her account.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that thereare totally three accused in this case, the petitioner is arrayed asA1 and the co-accused / A3 is in judicial custody.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted thatthe petitioner has not committed any such offence and he has nothingto do with present case and he has been falsely implicated in thishttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/case.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Courtis inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, withcertain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to bereleased on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance beforethe learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, and on hisexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only)with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thelearned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when requiredfor interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
TALLAKULAM (CRIME) POLICE STATION, MADURAI.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.M.MOHAMED RAFI Advocate SR.No.83865
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24158 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016
SMA/SS-3/SAR-1/30.12.2016:2P/6C