Uttarakhand High Court

WPSS/1859/2007 of PRATAP SINGH and ORS Vs STATE and ORS on 31 December 2007

2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri S.S. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ

WPSS 1859 of 2007

Heard Sri S.S. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents.

Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition has already been settled by Hon’ble Single Judge and confirmed by Division Bench of this court vide judgment and order dated 04.03.2006 in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005 (State of Uttaranchal and others Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others).

In view of the above statement, writ petition is disposed of on the same terms and observations made by Division Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 04.03.2006 in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005 (State of Uttaranchal and others Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others). All the pending applications stand disposed of.

31.12.2007VKS

(M.M.G., J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead