Uttarakhand High Court

ABA/31/2018 of SUBHASH DAS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 21 December 2018

of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. J.S. Virk, Assistant Government Advocate for the State of Uttarakhand. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Anticipatory Bail Application. Permission is granted.

ABA No. 31 of 2018

Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.

Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. J.S. Virk, Assistant Government Advocate for the State of Uttarakhand. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Anticipatory Bail Application.

Permission is granted.

The Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, applicant will be at liberty to move regular bail application. It is made clear that as soon as the applicant appears before the Court below and moves bail application, the same shall be considered, as far as possible on the same day itself on its merit. In case, bail application is deferred for any reasons (including its rejection), the concerned Magistrate shall forward the papers to the Sessions Court for deciding the bail application on the same day.

( Manoj K. Tiwari, J.)

Shiksha 21.12.2018

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead