Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/500/2008 of NAEEM AHMAD AND ANOTHER Vs STATE AND OTHERS on 29 December 2008
Relief Application No. 3996 of 2008 In WPCRL No. 500 of 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand/ opposite party no. 1 and 2. Mr. Ramji
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
CLMA Interim Relief Application No. 3996 of 2008
In
WPCRL No. 500 of 2008
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand/ opposite party no. 1 and 2.
Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated at bar that the writ petition has become infructuous as Final Report has already been submitted in Case Crime No. 95 of 2008 relating to offence punishable under Section 363, 366 I.P.C. Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar.
Relying upon the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All the pending application(s) stand(s) rejected.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (P.C. Verma, J.) 29.12.2008 29.12.2008 Rathour