Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23545/2013 of CHITHIRAI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23545 of 2013 1 CHITHIRAI 2 RANI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1&2 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23545 of 2013
1 CHITHIRAI
2 RANI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1&2
Vs
THE STATE REP BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THATTARMADAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT CRIME NO.218/2012 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.R.PONKARTHIKEYAN AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/accused 1 & 2 apprehending arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged commission offencespunishable under sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC inCrime No.218 of 2012 on the file of the respondent police seekanticipatory bail.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that thepetitioners are innocents and they are no way connected with thealleged occurrence and due to previous motive, they have beenfalsely implicated in this case.
3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submitthat date of occurrence is 22.12.2012 and the First InformationReport was registered on 23.12.2012 and in this case, investigationis going on.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam, Tuticorin District and oneach of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees tenthousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on furthercondition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafteras and when required. The petitioners shall comply with thecondition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2013
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SATHANKULAM TUTICORIN DISTRICT2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN DISTRICT3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THATTARMADAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT+1. CC to M/S.R.PONKARTHIKEYAN Advocate SR.No.64415RL/6C – 2/1/2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23545 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013