Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23483/2013 of MRS. R.SELVA CHITHRA Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23483 of 2013 MRS.R.SELVA CHITHRA ... PETITIONER/1st ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ELAYIRAMPANNAI
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23483 of 2013
MRS.R.SELVA CHITHRA ... PETITIONER/1[st] ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ELAYIRAMPANNAI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUANGAR DISTRICT.
CR. NO. 285/2013. ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT(S)
FOR PETITIONER : M/S.B.RAJESH SARAVANAN ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C.
ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section286, 338 and 304(A) IPC r/w Section 9B (1) (a) of Explosives Act in crimeNo.285 of 2013 and seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit thatthe petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged commission of offenceand she has been falsely implicated in this case.
3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that thepetitioner is the owner of the match factory and on 24.12.2013 thealleged incident occurred, in which, while loading match sticks, twoworkers died. He would further submit that there is no overt actattributed as against this petitioner.
4.At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner wouldsubmit that sufficient compensation had already been paid as per law tothe family of the deceased workers.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, thepetitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or onher appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sattur, andon her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousandonly) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thelearned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitionershall appear before the respondent police as and when required forinterrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulatedhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATTUR.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ELAYIRAMPANNAI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUANGAR.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.B.RAJESH SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.64454.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23483 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
2P/6CRPB 02.01.2014