Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23617/2013 of CHANDRAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23617 of 2013 CHANDRAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDUKKOTTAI TOWN POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23617 of 2013
CHANDRAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDUKKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION,PUDUKOTTAI.CR.NO.411/2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused and apprehending arrest at thehands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offencespunishable under sections 294(b) and 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.411 of 2013on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrelbetween the petitioner and the defacto complainant and no one sustainedinjury in the alleged occurrence.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that thecomplaint itself is false and concocted and the petitioner has nothing todo with the alleged commission of offence.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the state and alsoperused the entire materials available on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this is a fitcase for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, thepetitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or onhis appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai and onexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) withtwo sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shallreport before the respondent police daily at 11.00 a.m. for a period oftwo weeks and thereafter, the condition imposed is totally relaxed. Thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made readyfailing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDUKKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.64451
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23617 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
2P/6CRPB 30.12.2013