CRL OP(MD)/23621/2013 of M. MURUGAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23621 of 2013

1 M. MURUGAN

2 M. JOTHIMANI ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 & 2

Vs

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALANGUDI POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DT.

CR.NO.320 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.R.MAHESWARAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A2 and apprehending arrest atthe hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offencespunishable under sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.320 of2013 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the alleged occurrence wastaken place on 16.12.2013 and a case was registered on 17.12.2013 and thefirst petitioner is the father of the defacto complainant and on accountof some property dispute, there was a wordy quarrel between thepetitioners and the defacto complainant and no one sustained injury in thealleged occurrence.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that thecomplaint itself is false and concocted and the petitioners have nothingto do with the alleged commission of offence.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the state and alsoperused the entire materials available on record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this is a fitcase for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, thepetitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest oron their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi andon each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees tenthousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfactionhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 11.00 a.m.for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required, forinterrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulatedunder Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made readyfailing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ALANGUDI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

ALANGUDI POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.R.MAHESWARAN Advocate SR.No.23

TS/02.01.2014/2P-6C