Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24097/2016 of LIMAVIJAYAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24097 of 2016 LIMAVIJAYAN (*)@ VIJIGO ... PETITIONER / 2nd ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24097 of 2016
LIMAVIJAYAN (*)@ VIJIGO ... PETITIONER / 2[nd] ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL POLICE STATION,CRIME NO. 825 OF 2016THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicialcustody on 29.11.2016 for the alleged offences punishable underSections 341, 294(b), 387, 307 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.825 of2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused wrongfullyrestrained the defacto complainant and scolded him with filthylanguage and threatened with knife and demanded money.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that thepetitioner is the second accused in this case and he is an innocentand he has been falsely implicated in this case.4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing forthe respondent on instructions submitted that no one sustainedinjury in the occurrence.
5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the caseand also considering the period of incarceration undergone by thepetitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitionerwith certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered tobe released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum ofhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one Lakh only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi and on further condition that the petitionershall appear before the respondent police daily twice i.e., at 10.30a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders.
sd/-
29/12/2016
(*) CORRECTED ORDER ISSUED
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IITHOOTHUKUDI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATETHOOTHUKUDI
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICECENTRAL POLICE STATION,THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
5 THE SUPERINTENDENTCENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI+1. CC to M/S.S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate SR.No.83640
JAM/30.12.16/PV/SAR 3 2P-7CGJM/SS3/SAR-3-2.1.17-2P-7C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24097 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016