Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/24097/2016 of LIMAVIJAYAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24097 of 2016 LIMAVIJAYAN (*)@ VIJIGO ... PETITIONER / 2nd ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN

CRL OP(MD) No.24097 of 2016

LIMAVIJAYAN (*)@ VIJIGO ... PETITIONER / 2[nd] ACCUSED

Vs

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL POLICE STATION,CRIME NO. 825 OF 2016THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicialcustody on 29.11.2016 for the alleged offences punishable underSections 341, 294(b), 387, 307 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.825 of2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused wrongfullyrestrained the defacto complainant and scolded him with filthylanguage and threatened with knife and demanded money.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that thepetitioner is the second accused in this case and he is an innocentand he has been falsely implicated in this case.4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing forthe respondent on instructions submitted that no one sustainedinjury in the occurrence.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the caseand also considering the period of incarceration undergone by thepetitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitionerwith certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered tobe released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum ofhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one Lakh only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi and on further condition that the petitionershall appear before the respondent police daily twice i.e., at 10.30a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders.

sd/-

29/12/2016

(*) CORRECTED ORDER ISSUED

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IITHOOTHUKUDI

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATETHOOTHUKUDI

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICECENTRAL POLICE STATION,THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

5 THE SUPERINTENDENTCENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI+1. CC to M/S.S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate SR.No.83640

JAM/30.12.16/PV/SAR 3 2P-7CGJM/SS3/SAR-3-2.1.17-2P-7C

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.24097 of 2016

Date :29/12/2016

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead