Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24016/2016 of K. RAMESH, S/O.KOLAPPA PILLAI, Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24016 of 2016 1 K. RAMESH, 2 SASI, 3 MAHADEVAN @ MADHAVAN PILLAI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24016 of 2016
1 K. RAMESH,
2 SASI,
3 MAHADEVAN @ MADHAVAN PILLAI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REPRESENTED BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHUKADAI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT
CR.NO.550 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.JAYA KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, in Crime No.550of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest atthe hands of the respondent police for the alleged offencespunishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPCand hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners attackedthe defacto complaint and caused injuries.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that thepetitioners are innocent persons and they have been falselyimplicated in this case.
4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for therespondent on instructions submitted that the injured person hadalready been discharged from the hospital.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that the injured person had already beendischarged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to granthttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learnedJudicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District and onexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thelearned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply withthe condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHUKADAI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT
2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KUZHITHURAI
3 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, +1. CC to M/S.S.JAYA KUMAR Advocate SR.No.83823
GJM/SS3/SAR-3-30.12.16-2P-6C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24016 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016