CRL OP(MD)/23467/2013 of MUNIESWARI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23467 of 2013

1 MUNIESWARI

2 KODIESWARAN

3 KUMARAVADIVU

4 USHA

5 GOWTHAMI

6 SANTHI 7 KARTHIKA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 7

Vs

STATE REP BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUNKUDI POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.321 OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.K.SIVA BALAN AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishableunder Sections 147, 294(b), 452, 323 IPC and Section 4 of TamilNadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in crime No.321 of 2013and seek anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submitthat the petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged commissionof offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit thatthe petitioners and the de-facto complainant are neighbours andthere was a wordy quarrel arose and these petitioners alleged tohave attacked the de-facto complainant with sticks and hands.However, he would submit that the de-facto complainant has beenhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/discharged from the hospital.

4. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitionersthat the de-facto complainant suffered minor injuries and dischargedfrom the hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on their appearance before the learnedJudicial Magistrate, No.VI, Madurai, and on their executing a bondfor a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with twosureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate concerned and on further condition that the secondpetitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks. The petitioners 1, 3 to 7shall appear before the respondent police as and when required forinterrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concernedMagistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which theorder copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatorybail stands dismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI MADURAI

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUNKUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.K.SIVA BALAN Advocate SR.No.64443RL/6C – 2/1/2014