Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23634/2013 of A.G. SAKTHI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23634 of 2013 A.G. SAKTHI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE B3-THEPPAKULAM POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23634 of 2013
A.G. SAKTHI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE B3-THEPPAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DIST. CR.NO.1083 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.POORNACHANDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as A3 and apprehending arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged commission of offence punishableunder section 392 IPC altered into one under Section 395 IPC, in CrimeNo.1083 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatorybail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.10.2013, there was atheft of laptop and a case was registered against one unknown person andlater on by alteration report, the petitioner was made as accused.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit thatthe complaint itself is false and concocted and the petitioner hasnothing to do with the alleged commission of offence. It is furthersubmitted that the laptop was also been recovered as per the confessionstatement of A1.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the state and alsoperused the entire materials available on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this is afit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly,the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrestor on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Maduraiand on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousandonly) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitionershall report before the respondent police daily at 11.00 a.m. for aperiod of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required, for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulatedunder Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I MADURAI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
MADURAI
3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
B3-THEPPAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DIST.
AA/03.01.2014/ 2p- 5c/
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23634 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013