CRL OP(MD)/24087/2016 of SUBBIAH, S/O CHINNAKARUPPAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2016

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN

CRL OP(MD) No.24087 of 2016

SUBBIAH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY , THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.9 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

FOR PETITIONER : M/S.M.ARAVIND SUBRAMANIAM, ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.P.KANDASAMY, GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/accused, in Crime No.9 of 2016 on the file ofthe respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section498(A) of I.P.C and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.

3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for therespondent on instructions submitted that this is a case ofmatrimonial dispute and the petitioner is the husband of the defactocomplainant and the allegation is that the petitioner demanded dowryfrom the defacto complainant and harassed her.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that thepetitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicatedin this case.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that this is a case of matrimonial dispute,https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner,with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearancebefore the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam and on hisexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousandonly) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction ofthe learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with thecondition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

29/12/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.ARAVIND SUBRAMANIAM Advocate SR.No.83811

PM

TE/PM/SAR-I/30.12.2016 : 2P/6C