Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23532/2013 of RAVICHANDRAN Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23532 of 2013 1 RAVICHANDRAN 2 SELVI 3 SATHIYA KALA @ SATHIYA BAMA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3 Vs THE STATE THROUGH THE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23532 of 2013
1 RAVICHANDRAN
2 SELVI
3 SATHIYA KALA @ SATHIYA BAMA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3
Vs
THE STATE THROUGHTHE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, KEERANUR, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT CRIME NO.240 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
The petitioners/accused 1 to 3 apprehending arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged commission offencespunishable under sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC inCrime No.240 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police seekanticipatory bail.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that thepetitioners are innocents and they are no way connected with thealleged occurrence.
3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submitthat injured has been discharged from the hospital.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that injured has been discharged from thehospital, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners onanticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before thelearned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur and oneach of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees tenthousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on furthercondition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafteras and when required. The petitioners shall comply with thecondition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2013
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KEERANUR
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT
3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, KEERANUR, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT
+1. CC to M/S.P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.64441RL/6 C- 2/1/2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23532 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013