Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23474/2013 of RAYAPPAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23474 of 2013 1 RAYAPPAN 2 ARUNACHALAM 3 NARAYANAN 4 RAMAIAH 5 ESAKKIRAJA ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4 & 7 Vs. STATE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASHCRL OP(MD) No.23474 of 2013
1 RAYAPPAN
2 ARUNACHALAM
3 NARAYANAN
4 RAMAIAH
5 ESAKKIRAJA ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4 & 7
Vs.
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERAL POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.(CR.NO.383 OF 2013)..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.N.ANANDAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused 1 to 4 and 7 apprehending arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged commission of offencespunishable under sections 147, 341, 294(b) & 506(ii) of IPC in CrimeNo.383 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatorybail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
3. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatthis is a case of no injury.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that no injury has been caused by the petitioners,this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Srivaikundam, and on each of them executing a bond for a sumof Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as andwhen required. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI.
3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAL POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.N.ANANDAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.64431
ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23474 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
PBK 31/12/2013 2P/6C