Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23567/2013 of K. RAVI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23567 of 2013 K. RAVI ... PETITIONER/PROPOSED ACCUSED Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIVAKASI EAST POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23567 of 2013
K. RAVI ... PETITIONER/PROPOSED ACCUSED
Vs
STATE REPRESENTED BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIVAKASI EAST POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI, CRIME NO.639/2013 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.A.SIVAJI AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged commission of offences punishable undersections 286 of I.P.C. read with Section 9(B)(1)(a) of ExplosivesSubstances Act, in Crime No.639 of 2013 on the file of therespondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the petitioner is that the alleged occurrence hasbeen taken place on 19.12.2013 and there was a fire accident in thelicensed premises of the owner of the factory.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thepetitioner is the Manager of the factory and the sole accused, theForeman was arrested released on bail and the petitioner is only theManager of the unit and his name does not figure in the firstinformation report.
4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submitthat in the accident that was taken place, no injury to humans andonly the unit suffered damages.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. In the light of the above facts and circumstances of thecases, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioner with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released onbail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learnedJudicial Magistrate, Sivakasi and on executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned andon further condition that the petitioner shall appear before therespondent police for a period of two weeks and thereafter as andwhen required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply withthe conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2013
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAKASI SIVAKASI
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR
3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIVAKASI EAST POLICE STATION, SIVAKASI, +1. CC to M/S.A.SIVAJI Advocate SR.No.64468RL/6C – 2/1/2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23567 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013