CRL OP(MD)/23797/2016 of MUPPIDATHI Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVANCRL OP(MD) No.23797 of 2016

1 MUPPIDATHI 2 RAJ 3 DEIVANAI 4 GOMATHI

5 PANDURANGAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 5

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY , THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,NAGERCOIL KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT,CRIME NO.11/2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A-1 to A-5, in Crime No.11of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest atthe hands of the respondent police for the alleged offencespunishable under Sections 498(A), 406 of I.P.C and Section 4 ofDowry Prohibition Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learnedGovernment Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.

3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for therespondent on instructions submitted that this is a case ofmatrimonial dispute and the first petitioner is the husband of thedefacto complainant and the others are the in-laws of the defactocomplainant.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falselyimplicated in this case.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that this is a case of matrimonial dispute,this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitionersare ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on hisappearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoiland on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum tothe satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on furthercondition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitionersshall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C.scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

29/12/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,NAGERCOIL.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL. KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.83723

PM

JAM/SKN/SAR-III/30.12.2016: 2P/6C