CRL OP(MD)/23498/2013 of KANIMOLI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23498 of 2013

KANIMOLI

... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1

Vs

STATE REP BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.731 OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.T.A.EBENEZER AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN

Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishableunder Sections 294(b), 323 IPC r/w Section 4 of Tamil NaduProhibition of Harassment of Women Act in crime No.731 of 2013 andseeks anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submitthat the petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged commission ofoffence and she has been falsely implicated in this case.

3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit thatthe alleged occurrence had taken place on 18.12.2013 and the casehas been registered on 23.12.2013. He would further submit thatthere was a wordy quarrel ensured between the petitioner and the de-facto complainant with neighbours and no one sustained injury in thealleged occurrence.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thishttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai and on her executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned andon further condition that the petitioner shall appear before therespondent police as and when required for interrogation. Thepetitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MELUR, MADURAI2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.+1. CC to M/S.T.A.EBENEZER Advocate SR.No.64449RL/6 C- 2/1/2014