Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23564/2013 of DR. MOHANA SUNDARAM Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23564 of 2013 DR. MOHANA SUNDARAM ... PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUMANGALAM ALL
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23564 of 2013
DR. MOHANA SUNDARAM ... PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUMANGALAM ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT. CR. NO. 61 OF 2013. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.K.SAMIDURAI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was remanded to the judicial custody by therespondent police on 18.12.2013 for the alleged offence under Sections498(A) 294(b), 506(ii) of IPC r/w Section 4 of TNPWH Act in Crime No.61of 2013 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner along withother accused had demanded dowry and harassed the defacto complainant'ssister one Vijaya who is the wife of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that A2to A4 in this case have already been released on anticipatory bail by theSessions Court, Madurai in Crl.M.P.No.9900 of 2013 on 20.12.2013 and thepetitioner is the husband and he is a Government Doctor.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that there isfamily dispute between the parties which leads to this criminal case.
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and thelearned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and alsoperused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the following conditions.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail onexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) withtwo sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedJudicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam, and on further condition that thepetitioner appear before the respondent police as and when required forinterrogation.
sd/-
30/12/2013
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TIRUMANGALAM
2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATEMADURAIMADURAI
3 THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAICENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
THIRUMANGALAM ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT.MADURAI DT.
5 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.K.SAMIDURAI Advocate SR.No.64367
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23564 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
NA/30/12/2013/P2/7C