Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/322/2012 of DR. AVANEET KUMAR GHILDIAL Vs CHANCELLOR, H.N.B. GARHWAL UNIVERSITY and ORS. on 24 December 2014
Appl. No.4816 of 2012) In WPSB No.322 of 2012 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for respondents. Heard. Short counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.2 and 3 is accepted on record.
Conclusion
(Misc. Appl. No.4816 of 2012)
In
WPSB No.322 of 2012
Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J.
Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for respondents.
Heard.
Short counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.2 and 3 is accepted on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous and same may be dismissed as infructuous but liberty be given to the petitioner to file fresh petition against the notification which was issued during the pendency of the writ.
In our view, there is no need to grant such liberty as it is always open for the parties to challenge such notification by way of filing writ petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Misc. application stands disposed of.
Arti
(U.C. Dhyani, J.)(V.K. Bist, J.) 24.12.2014
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…