Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24141/2016 of BALAMANI, Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24141 of 2016 BALAMANI, ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY CITY.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24141 of 2016
BALAMANI, ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.2
Vs
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY CITY.
(REF.CRIME NO.24/2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.D.SHANMUGA RAJA SETHUPATHI Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A-2, in Crime No.24 of 2016on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable underSection 465, 468, 471 and 420 I.P.C and hence, seeks anticipatorybail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.
3.The case of the prosecution is that without disclosing thependency of a civil suit, the petitioners are said to have sold theproperty to the defacto complainant.
4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in thiscase, A-1 was already arrested and released on bail and hence, thispetitioner may be granted anticipatory bail.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, withcertain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to bereleased on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance beforethe learned Judicial Magistrate, No.3, Trichy and on his executing abond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with twosureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitionershall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m daily until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.3, TRICHY
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY DISTRICT
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
CITY CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY CITY.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
+1. CC to M/S.D.SHANMUGA RAJA SETHUPATHI Advocate SR.No.83796
GJM/CK/SAR-3-30.12.16-2P-6C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24141 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016