Uttarakhand High Court
BA3/1179/2002 of MUSTAKEEM Vs STATE on 22 November 2002
HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 22nd day of November, 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1179 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE Mustakeem son of Sri Nisar, resident of village Rahimpur, Police Station Gangnehar, Roorkee,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital: the 22nd day of November, 2002
Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1179 of 2002
Order on the Bail Application
CRIMINAL SIDE
Mustakeem son of Sri Nisar, resident of village Rahimpur, Police Station Gangnehar, Roorkee, District Hardwar State of Uttaranchal
…………………Applicant(s)
Versus
………………………..Opposite Party
Arising out of- Case crime no. 87 of 2001, Under sections 364, 368, 216 of I.P.C., Police Station Jhebreda, District Hardwar By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and the learned Additional Government Advocate on the third bail application moved on behalf of the applicant- accused.
This is third bail application. No cogent ground for grant of bail is made out. The application is liable to be dismissed.
It is reported that the case has not yet been committed to the Court of Sessions on account of thefact that the court of Judicial Magistrate has been lying vacant. The learned Serssions Judge shall have the case transferred to the court of Magistrate having a Presiding Officer so that the case may be committed and the trial be expedited.
Bail application is dismissed accordingly.
22.11.02./B.
(Irshad Hussain, J.)