Madras High Court
TC/208/1998 of COMMR OF I.T, Vs M/S.HOLIDAY TRAVELS (P)LTD. on 25 November 2002
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT %DATED : 08.03.2019 *CORAM THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Relief
?BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT%DATED : 08.03.2019*CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
+Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3446 of 2019#Govindaraj... Petitioner/Vs./$1.The Inspector of Police,Mudhukulathur Police Station,Ramanathapuram District.[Crime No.136 of 2015]
2.Sathyaraj ... Respondents
Prayer: Petition ~ filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, todirect the 1st respondent police to expeditiously investigate the case inCrime No.136 of 2015 pending on the file of the 1st respondent policeenabling to file charge sheet and direct the 1st respondent police toinvestigate the 2nd respondent in order to find out the petitioner-sdaughter~in~law namely Banupriya, aged about 24 years, wife of Arasakumar ofkathayan Village.!For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Laxman^For R~1 : Mr.V.NeelkandanAdditional Public Prosecutor
:ORDER
This petition is filed to direct the 1st respondent police toexpeditiously investigate the case in Crime No.136 of 2015 pending on thefile of the 1st respondent police enabling to file charge sheet and directthe 1st respondent police to investigate the 2nd respondent in order to findout the petitioner-s daughter~in~law namely Banupriya, aged about 24 years,wife of Arasakumar of kathayan Village.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner-s daughter~in~law namely Banupriya has opted to live with thesecond respondent and since she is a major, she has taken her independentdecision. There is no crime involving as such.
4. The said statement of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is recorded. Now, the petitioner or his son as the case may be is at liberty towork out their remedies as per law. The Investigating Agency is now directedto file a final report before the concerned Magistrate indicating the detailsgathered during investigation. Accordingly, this criminal original petitionis disposed of.
1. The Inspector of Police,Mudhukulathur Police Station,Ramanathapuram District.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor,Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.