Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23655/2013 of RODDU VELLAI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23655 of 2013 RODDU VELLAI ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23655 of 2013

RODDU VELLAI

... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

Vs

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, NATHAM, DINDIGUL DT. CR.NO.341 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission offences punishable undersections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.341 of 2013 on thefile of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatinjured has been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital,this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Natham, Dindigul District and on executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on furthercondition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent policedaily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and whenrequired. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated underSection 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within aperiod of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NATHAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAM POLICE STATION, NATHAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No. 64409.

TS/31.12.2013/2P-6C

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23655 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead