Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23655/2013 of RODDU VELLAI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23655 of 2013 RODDU VELLAI ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23655 of 2013
RODDU VELLAI
... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, NATHAM, DINDIGUL DT. CR.NO.341 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission offences punishable undersections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.341 of 2013 on thefile of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatinjured has been discharged from the hospital.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital,this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.
5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Natham, Dindigul District and on executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on furthercondition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent policedaily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and whenrequired. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated underSection 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.
6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within aperiod of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/-
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NATHAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAM POLICE STATION, NATHAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No. 64409.
TS/31.12.2013/2P-6C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23655 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013