Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23464/2013 of MOHAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23464 of 2013 1 MOHAN 2 RANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANKARAPURAM

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23464 of 2013

1 MOHAN

2 RANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 2

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANKARAPURAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 379/2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.K.KUMARAVEL Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who were arrested by the respondent police on5/12/2013 for the alleged offence under Sections 8 (C) r/w. 20 (b)(ii) (b) of NDPS Act in Crime No.379 of 2013 on the file of therespondent police, seek bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that thepetitioners are innocent and they had not committed any offence.

3. Learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) strongly objected togrant bail to the petitioners because the petitioners were arrestedwhile they were in possession of 1.300(1.3 kg) kilograms of ganja.

4. I have carefully considered the rival contentions putforward by either side and also perused the materials available onrecord.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering all these facts and also considering the fact, Iam inclined to grant the relief of bail to the petitioners.Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail ontheir executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousandonly) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge ECAct, Thanjavur, and they shall appear before the respondent Policedaily at 11.00 a.m., until further orders.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE/ SPECIAL JUDGE EC ACT CASES, THANJAVUR. EC ACT CASES, THANJAVUR.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANKARAPURAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT. NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY.

4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.K.KUMARAVEL Advocate SR.No.64371.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

CRL OP(MD) No.23464 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

msm 31.12.2013 p2/6c

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead