Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/19514/2019 of Ratheesh Vs The Inspector of Police on 30 December 2019
No.19514 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/12/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD). No.19514 of 2019 1. RATHEESH 2. PRATHEESH 3. SANJEEVHASAN ... PETITIONER/A1 TO A3 VS STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI
1. RATHEESH
2. PRATHEESH
3. SANJEEVHASAN ... PETITIONER/A1 TO A3
VS
STATE REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KALIYAKKAAVILAI POLICE STATION, KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.290/2019).... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C
PRAYER :-
For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.290/2019 on the file of theRespondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners andthe learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for therespondent.
2. The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b),341, 323 & 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.290 of 2019 on the file ofthe respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainantis an auto driver, who drive his auto behind the petitioners car andgiven horn to move forward, however, the petitioners drove their carwithout giving space to teh defacto complainant and indulged inwordy quarrel. Hence, the complaint.
4.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that thepetitioners are innocent person and they have not committed anyoffence as alleged by the prosecution.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submitted thatthe injured has been discharged from the hospital.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I aminclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certainconditions. Accordingly, petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithurai, and on their executinga bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each withtwo sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitionersshall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. untilfurther orders. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionsstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shallstand dismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2019
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KULITHURAI. KULITHURAI.
2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
KALIYAKKAAVILAI POLICE STATION, KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1 CC to M/s.S.BHARATHI, Advocate ( SR-22534[I] dated 30/12/2019 )
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.19514 of 2019 Date :30/12/2019
RMJM/PN/SAR 2/03.01.2020/3P/6C