Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/18031/2017 of K.PACHAMAL, Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 28 December 2017

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.18031 of 2017 K.PACHAMAL ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHATHRAKUDI

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand SeventeenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN

CRL OP(MD) No.18031 of 2017

K.PACHAMAL

... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1

Vs

STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHATHRAKUDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. CRIME NO.76 OF 2017.... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.R.MURUGAN Advocate

For Respondent : M/S.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who was arrested and remanded to judicialcustody on 18.12.2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 307 IPC in Crime No.76 of 2017 on the file of therespondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainantis the father-in-law of the petitioner and due to some propertydispute, the petitioner is said to have attacked the defactocomplainant and caused injury to him, which resulted in registrationof the present case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted thatthe petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he isready to abide by any conditions being imposed by this Court.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) has stronglyobjected to the grant of bail, contending that the investigation ofthe case is at the initial stage and if the petitioner/accused islet out on bail, there is every possibility of the accused tamperingthe witnesses/evidences and hampering the investigation.

5. Taking into consideration the serious nature of theallegations levelled against this petitioner and the fact that hehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/was taken into custody only from 18.12.2017, this Court is notinclined to grant the relief as prayed for by the petitioner.

6. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition standsdismissed accordingly. sd/- 28/12/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHATHRAKUDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2. THE OFFICER INCHARGE,SUB JAIL, PARAMAKUDI.

3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.18031 of 2017

Date :28/12/2017

MS/CM-VR/SAR.1/02.01.2018/2P.4C

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead