Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24002/2016 of GUNASEKARAN, S/O.VEERANAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24002 of 2016 1 GUNASEKARAN, 2 GANASEKARAN, 3 VEERANAN, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24002 of 2016
1 GUNASEKARAN,
2 GANASEKARAN,
3 VEERANAN, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED
Vs
STATE THROUGHINSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIKARMANGALAM POLICE STATION,USILAMPATTI TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT
CR.NO.191 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.MOORTHY Advocate
For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3, inCrime No.191 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehendarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) ofIPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and otheraccused attacked the defacto complaint and caused injuries.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that thepetitioners are innocent persons and they have been falselyimplicated in this case.
4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for therespondent on instructions submitted that the injured person hadalready been discharged from the hospital.5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that the injured person had already beendischarged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grantanticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on their appearance before the learnedhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/Judicial Magistrate No.II, Usilampatti and on executing a bond for asum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrateconcerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appearbefore the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until furtherorders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulatedunder Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, USILAMPATTI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIKARMANGALAM POLICE STATION, USILAMPATTI TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, +1. CC to M/S.S.MOORTHY Advocate SR.No.83647
GJM/SS3/SAR-3-30.12.16-2P-6C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24002 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016