Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/46810/2016 of POOJA SHARMA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ORS. on 30 December 2016
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No. 110 CRM-M-46810-2016 Decided on : 30.12.2016 Pooja Sharma and another ..... Petitioners VERSUS State of UT, Chandigarh and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL Present: Ms.Harpinder Kaur Sandhu, Advocate, for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 110CRMM468102016Decided on: 30.12.2016Pooja Sharma and another—__ Petitioners
VERSUS
State of UT, Chandigarh and others ..... Respondents CORAMHON-BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBALPresentMs.Harpinder Kaur Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioners.
5555555
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (ORAL)
Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only at this stage.Mr.Sukant Gupta, Addl.P.P., for UT, Chandigarh, who ispresent in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1! to 3
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to supply foursets of the paper book to learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3, duringthe course of the day.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that thepetitionershave married each other against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 9 andon account of this act on their part, they are under threat of beingeliminated at the hands of respondents No.4 to 9. In view of the above,seeking protection, a representation dated 21.12.2016 (Annexure P-4)was made on behalf of the petitioners to the Senior Superintendent ofPolice, Chandigarh but to no avail. |
In the above circumstances, the petitioners have approachedthis Court through the present petition.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter,particularly the validity of the alleged marriage, the SeniorSuperintendent of Police, Chandigarh (respondent No.2) is directed toforthwith consider the aforesaid representation dated 21.12.2016(Annexure P-4) made on behalf of the petitioners and thereafter takeappropriate action on the same as is deemed fit in accordance with law toensure the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
30.12.2016| DEEPAK SIBAL |shamsherJUDGEWhether speaking/reasonedYes / NoWhether reportable: Yes / No