Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23599/2013 of JEYAKODI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23599 of 2013 1 JEYAKODI 2 MEENA 3 PANDIAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23599 of 2013
1 JEYAKODI
2 MEENA
3 PANDIAMMAL
... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.CRIME NO.48 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
FOR PETITIONER : M/S.T.VADIVELAN ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C.
ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 4 apprehending arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged commission of offencespunishable under sections 498-A, 294(b) & 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.48 of2013 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that thepetitioners are in-laws and they are no way connected with the allegedoccurrence. He would further submit that the de-facto complainant gotmarried the first accused in the year 2009.
3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatthe first accused/husband in this case has already been arrested.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.
5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Ushilampatti, and on each of them executing a bond for a sumof Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter asand when required. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, USILAMPATTI.
2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI.
4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC TO M/S.T.VADIVELAN ADVOCATE SR.NO.64464.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23599 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
2P/6CRPB 02.01.2014