Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24159/2016 of PALANISAMY Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24159 of 2016 1 PALANISAMY 2 M.C.PANDI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.1 and 2 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24159 of 2016
1 PALANISAMY
2 M.C.PANDI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.1 and 2
Vs
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 602 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.BALAJI Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2, inCrime No.602 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehendarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 294(b) and 506(ii)I.P.C hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.
3.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners are saidto have received a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- from the defacto complainantfor getting a job in the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation andfailed to do so and also cheated him.
4.According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, thereare innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners,with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are orderedto be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearancehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Usilampatti, MaduraiDistrict and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned andon further condition that each of the petitioners shall deposit asum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) to the credit ofCr.No.602 of 2016 before the concerned Court and they shall appearbefore the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until furtherorders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulatedunder Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IUSILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATEMADURAI
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICEUSILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.S.BALAJI Advocate SR.No.83714
JAM/30.12.16/ck/SAR 2/2p-6c
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24159 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016