Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/1435/2002 of MITTHAN LAL SHAH Vs SECRETARY, NAGAR VIKASH and ORS. on 29 December 2007

2002 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri A.D. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Keeping in view the

WPSB 1435 of 2002 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J.

Heard Sri A.D. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.

Keeping in view the submissions made at bar, the writ petition is dismissed being infructuous. All the pending applications stand disposed of.

29.12.2007VKS

(M.M.G., J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead