Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/19578/2019 of Rajesh Vs The Inspector of Police on 30 December 2019
No.19578 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/12/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD). No.19578 of 2019 Rajesh ... Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Kadaladi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Date : 30/12/2019PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI
Rajesh ... Petitioner
Vs
The Inspector of Police,Kadaladi Police Station,Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.106/2019). ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.Raja.Veeramanikandan Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C
PRAYER :-
For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 106/2019 on the file of theRespondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/ A12 apprehends arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections147, 148, 294(b), 307, 323, 324, 506(ii) and 109 of IPC, in CrimeNo.106 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeksanticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to the motive andrivalry between two villagers, the petitioner and others attackedthe defacto complainant and his brother. Due to the impact, thedefact complainant lodged a complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed anyoffence as alleged by the prosecution.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing forthe respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged fromthe hospital.
5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case andalso considering the fact that the injured has been discharged fromthe hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail tothe petitioner with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bailin the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learnedJudicial Magistrate, Kadaladi and on his executing a bond for a sumof Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) along with two suretieseach for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrateconcerned and the petitioner shall appear before the respondentpolice daily at 10.00 a.m and 05.00 pm, until further orders. Thepetitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2019
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.III)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KADALADI.2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADALADI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD) No.19578 of 2019
MSA/RMKTE/VR/SAR-III : 03/01/2020 : 2P/5Chttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/