CRL OP(MD)/23535/2013 of EMERSON KOIL SINGH Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23535 of 2013

EMERSON KOIL SINGH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

Vs

THE STATE REP BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT (CRIME NO. 385 OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.P.T.RAMESH RAJA AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused and apprehending arrest atthe hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission ofoffences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC., in CrimeNo.385 of 2013, seeks anticipatory bail.

3. The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordyquarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wouldsubmit that the petitioner is nothing todo with the allegedoccurrence and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit thatinvestigation is pending and no one sustained injuries.

5. This Court, taking into consideration of the above saidfacts and circumstances, is inclined to enlarge the petitioner onanticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to behttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance beforethe learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with twosureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thelearnedMagistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitionershall appear before the respondent daily at 11.00 a.m., for a periodof two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. The petitionershall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C.scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SATHANKULAM2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT+1. CC to M/S.P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate SR.No.64414RL/6 C- 2/1/2014