BA1/967/2006 of VISHAL Vs STATE on 22 December 2006

HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Bail Application No.967 of 2006

CRIMINAL SIDE

Vishal S/o Daleep

R/o Saket Colony, Roorkee, P.S. Kotwali

Gangnehar, District Haridwar. .........Applicant (in Jail)

Versus

State of Uttaranchal

..........Opposite Party

In Case crime No.14 of 2006 Under Section 379 & 411 I.P.C. Police Station Gangnehar, Roorkee, District- Haridwar By the Court Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J.

Heard Sri Sanjeev Singh counsel for the applicant.

The applicant applied for bail in case Crime No. 14 of 2006, under section 379 and 411 I.P.C. P.S. Gangnehar, District Haridwar.

The counsel for the applicant has submitted that the F.I.R. has been lodged with undue delay and the accused has not been named in the F.I.R. Further counsel has submitted that no identification parade was conducted, the alleged recovery has also not been made in accordance with law and the offence is triable by the Magistrate.

Without expressing any thing on the merit of the case I

am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to bail.

Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned.

(Rajesh Tandon, J.)

Dated 22.12.2006

*Dhayani