CRL OP(MD)/23510/2013 of KUMAR @ SENTHIL KUMAR Vs THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23510 of 2013

1 KUMAR @ SENTHIL KUMAR

2 GOBI @ RAJA GOPAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 2 & 3

Vs

STATE REP BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN,TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.1 OF 2012) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.S.SENTHILSANKARANATHAKUMAR AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 4of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in crime No.1 of2012 and seek anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit thatthe petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged commission of offenceand they have been falsely implicated in this case.

3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that thepetitioners and the de-facto complainant are neighbours. He would furthersubmit that A1 had already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by thisCourt on 23.02.2012 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1852 of 2012 and these petitionersare A2 & A3 respectively.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly,the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrestor on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,Thoothukudi and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditionthat the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as andwhen required. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I THOOTHUKUDI

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI

3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN

+1. CC to M/S.S.SENTHILSANKARANATHAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.64492

AA/02.01.2014/ 2p- 6c/