Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/3596/2024 of M/S PITAMBER ORNAMENT FEDERATION Vs M/S DURGA ASSOCIATES on 31 December 2024

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS 3596/2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate, for the petitioner. (2) Petitioner has challenged order dated

|**SL.** **No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,** **reports, orders** **or proceedings** **or directions and** **Registrar’s order** **with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**| |---|---|---|---|---| |||||**W PMS 3 5 9 6 / 2 0 2 4** **Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.** Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate, for the petitioner. (2) Petitioner has challenged order dated 7.8.2024, passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Haldwani in Civil Suit No. 80 of 2024. By the said order, an ex parte ad interim injunction has been granted in favour of plaintiff. (3) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has filed written statement as well as objection to the temporary injunction application on 26.10.2024, however, his objection has not been considered so far. He refers to the provision contained in Rule 3A of Order 39 CPC, which ordains that in a case where ex parte ad interim injunction is granted without notice to other party, then the Court shall make endeavour to dispose of the temporary injunction application within 30 days. (4) Having regard to the aforesaid provision, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to dispose of temporary injunction application on the next date fixed in the matter. **( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)** **3 1 .1 2 .2 0 2 4** Pr|

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…